User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Roku) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Web/1.1 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/television/roku.yaml
Web 1.1Webkit 537.36 televisionclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Safari 537.36closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Safari 537.36close closecloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Safari 537.36close media-playercloseclose0.20301 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Safari WebKit 0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari close closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.13501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Safari WebKit 537.36 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.25602 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Web 1.1Webkit 537.36 Rokutelevisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Safari close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:10:01 | by ThaDafinser