User agent detail

RhythmDisplayAdSDK-E-Android LG-P506-2.2.1-43074
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close LGP506closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
RhythmDisplayAdSDK-E-Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeAndroidOS LGcloseclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Android Browser closeAndroid LGThrivemobile-browseryescloseclose0.26702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
LGP506smartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid LGP506closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15301 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Stock Android Browser Android LGLGP506closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Android Browser Android LGThrivemobile:smartyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Android close Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeAndroid LGP506closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:09:58 | by ThaDafinser