User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Windows) Version/12.02
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 12.02 Windows desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 12.02closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera 12.02closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera 9.80closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.21301 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 12.02Presto Windows desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 12.02close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 12.2closeWindows closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Opera 12.02 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15401 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 12.02close closecloseclosecloseclose0.16001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 12.2 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24101 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera 12.02 Windows desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.02closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera 12.02closeWindows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:09:56 | by ThaDafinser