User agent detail

LG-U8210/V080 Obigo/WAP2.0 MIDP-2.0/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close LGU8210closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Teleca-Obigo JAVA LGU8210Mobile Phoneyes0.007 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Teleca-Obigo closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.051 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
LG-U8210 V080closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
ObigoBrowser closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Obigo WAP 2.0close LGU8210mobile-browseryescloseclose0.21001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Obigo WAP2 LGU8210smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 2.0close LGU8210closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Obigo 2.0 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15501 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Obigo WAP2 Browser WAP2 LGLGU8210closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo WAP 2.0 LGU8210mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close LGU8210Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.021 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Obigo WAP2.0close LGU8210closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:09:55 | by ThaDafinser