User agent detail

Mozilla/4.72 [en] (X11; I; HP-UX B.11.00 9000/800)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
Netscape 4.72Gecko unknownHP-UX unknownunknowngeneral DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Netscape 4.72Gecko HP-UX Desktop0.012 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Netscape 4.72closeHP-UX closecloseDesktopclose0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Netscape Communicator 4.7.2closeHP-UX 11.00desktop-browsercloseclose0.20401 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
HP-UX desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 4.72close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 4.72 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15301 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Netscape Navigator 4.72 a UNIX based OS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Netscape Communicator 4.7.2 HP-UX 11.00desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:09:55 | by ThaDafinser