User agent detail

Links (0.98; Darwin 6.0 Power Macintosh)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
Links 0.98unknown unknownDarwin unknownunknowngeneral DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Links 0.98 Darwin Desktop0.006 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Links 0.98closeDarwin closecloseDesktopclose0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Links closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

Links 0.98closeMac OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.21001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Links 0.98Text-based Mac desktop0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Links 0.98close closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Links 0.98 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Links 0.98closeDarwin 6.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.071 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Links 0.98 Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Links 0.98 closeclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Links 0.98closeMac OS Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:09:55 | by ThaDafinser