User agent detail

TinyBrowser/2.0 (TinyBrowser Comment; rv:1.9.1a2pre) Gecko/20201231
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-712.php
TinyBrowser 2.0Gecko unknownLinux unknownunknownLinux DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
TinyBrowser 2.0Gecko Linux Desktop0.009 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
TinyBrowser 2.0closeLinux closecloseDesktopclose0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
TinyBrowser 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
No result found
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Mozilla 1.9.1a2preclose closecloseclosecloseclose0.12401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Gecko based browser Gecko 20201231 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41802 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Gecko 1.9.1a2 closeclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:09:55 | by ThaDafinser