User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030516 Mozilla Firebird/0.6
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
Firefox 0.6Gecko 1.0Win98 98unknownWindows DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Firefox 0.6Gecko 1.0Win98 98Desktop0.009 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.4bcloseWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Firebird (old name for Firefox) 0.6closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.20901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Firebird 0.6Gecko Windows 98desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Firebird 0.6close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows 98 closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Firebird 0.6Gecko 1.4closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15601 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Firebird 0.6closeWindows 98 closecloseclosecloseclose0.079 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Firebird 0.6Gecko 20030516Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24301 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Firebird 0.6Gecko 1.4Windows 98desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Firebird 0.6closeWindows 98 SEcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:09:55 | by ThaDafinser