User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; Polaris 6.2; Brew 3.1.5; en)/240X320 Samsung sam-r640
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close Samsungsam-r640closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeBREWOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Polaris 6.2closeBrew 3.1.5Samsungsam-r640mobile-browseryescloseclose0.23001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Polaris 6.2 Brew 3.1Samsungsam-r640smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 4.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Polaris 6.2close Samsungsam-r640closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Netscape Navigator 4.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24001 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Polaris 6.2 Brew 3.1.5Samsungsam-r640mobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close SamsungR631Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Polaris 6.2close Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:09:54 | by ThaDafinser