User agent detail

SIE-CX6V/00 UP.Browser/7.0.0.1.121 (GUI) MMP/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close SiemensCX6Vclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.0 Mobile Phoneyes0.006 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.0close closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
SIE-CX6V closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Openwave Mobile Browser 7.0.0.1.121close SiemensCX65mobile-browseryescloseclose0.21501 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.0 SiemensCX6Vsmartphoneyes0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 7.0.0close SiemensCX6Vcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Openwave Mobile Browser 7.0.0.1.121 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Openwave 7.0 SiemensCX6mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close SiemensCX65Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.026 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.0.0.1.121close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:09:53 | by ThaDafinser