User agent detail

MOZILLA40 (COMPATIBLE MSIE 60 WINDOWS CE IEMOBILE 612) SP 320X240 HTC_S630
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close HTCS630closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Edge 612closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
IE 612closeWindowsMobileOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

IE Mobile 612closeWindows HTCS630mobile-browseryescloseclose0.21001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
IE Mobile 612Trident Windows CE HTCS630smartphoneyes0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Internet Explorer 60closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close HTCS630closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Internet Explorer 60 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

IE Mobile close closecloseclosecloseclose0.065 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Internet Explorer Mobile Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Mobile Internet Explorer 60 Windows Mobile HTCS630 Caveliermobile:smartyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
IEMobile 612closeWindows CEHTCS630closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:09:51 | by ThaDafinser