User agent detail

livedoor FeedFetcher/0.01 (http://reader.livedoor.com/; 999 subscribers)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Woothee
v1.3.0
vendor/woothee/woothee-testset/testsets/crawler.yaml
close closecloseclosecloseyeslivedoor FeedFetcherclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesFeedFetcherRSS0.011 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesFeedFetcherclose0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
livedoor closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyesLivedoorclose0.21001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
No result found
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

No result found
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesLivedoorclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyeslivedoor FeedFetcherclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:09:48 | by ThaDafinser