User agent detail

SAMSUNG-SGHT100/1.0 UP.Browser/4.1.26b
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close SamsungSGHT100closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1 Mobile Phoneyes0.025 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1close closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.055 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
SAMSUNG-SGHT100 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1.26bclose SamsungSGH-T100mobile-browseryescloseclose0.22401 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1 SamsungSGHT100smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 4.1.26close SamsungSGHT100closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1.26b closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.39902 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Openwave 4.1 SamsungSGHT100mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close SamsungSGH-T100Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1.26bclose SamsungSGHT100closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:09:47 | by ThaDafinser