User agent detail

MOT-MOTOU9_CMCC/1.0 LinuxOS/2.6.10 Release/03.17.2008 Browser/OSS1.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Software/bobby0825_U9_blur
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close MotorolaMOTOU9_CMCCclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
MOT-MOTOU9 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

closeLinux MotorolaMOTOU9mobile-browseryescloseclose0.21581 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
GNU/Linux MotorolaMOTOU9smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux MotorolaMOTOU9_CMCCcloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15181 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23201 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Linux MotorolaMOTOU9mobile:featureyescloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet closeLinux Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeGNU/Linux MotorolaMOTOU9closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:09:47 | by ThaDafinser