User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2 i586; en-US; m18) Gecko/20010131 Netscape6/6.01
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
vendor/piwik/device-detector/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Netscape 6.01Gecko GNU/Linux desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Netscape 6.0Gecko Linux Desktop0.037 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Netscape 6.0closeLinux closecloseDesktopclose0.029 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Netscape closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Netscape Navigator 6.01closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.20001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Netscape 6.01Gecko GNU/Linux desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Netscape Navigator 6.01closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Netscape 6.1closeLinux 2.4.2closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Netscape 6 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Netscape 6.01closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.066 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Netscape Navigator 6.1Gecko 20010131Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Netscape 6.01Gecko Linux desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Netscape 6closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:09:46 | by ThaDafinser