User agent detail

Lynx/2.8.5rel.1 libwww-FM/2.15FC SSL-MM/1.4.1c OpenSSL/0.9.7e-dev
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-562.php
Lynx 2.8unknown unknownLinux unknownunknowngeneral DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Lynx 2.8 Linux Desktop0.008 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Lynx 2.8closeLinux closecloseDesktopclose0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Lynx 2.8.5rel.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

Lynx 2.8.5rel.1close desktop-browsercloseclose0.20601 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Lynx 2.8Text-based 0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Lynx 2.8.5rel.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Lynx 2.8.5close closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Lynx 2.8.5rel.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.056 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Lynx 2.8.5rel.1 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24801 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Lynx 2.8.5 closeclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close LynxBrowserOther Non-Mobilecloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Lynx 2.8.5rel.1close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:09:39 | by ThaDafinser