User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; fr; rv:1.8.1) VoilaBot BETA 1.2 (support.voilabot@orange-ftgroup.com)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
vendor/piwik/device-detector/Tests/fixtures/bots.yml
closecloseyesOrange BotSearch bot0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesVoilaBotBot/Crawler0.08 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesVoilaBotclose0.045 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.8.1closeWindows 5.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyesVoilaBot BETA 1.2close0.21601 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yesOrange BotSearch bot0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesVoilaBotclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 1.8.1closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

VoilaBot Crawler Beta 1.2 Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23801 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesVoilabotclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeWindows XPcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:09:38 | by ThaDafinser