User agent detail

Opera/9.26 (Windows 95; U; xx)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 9.26 Windows 95desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Opera 9.26Presto 2.0Win95 95Desktop0.012 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Opera 9.26close closecloseDesktopclose0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 9.26closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera 9.26closeWindows 95desktop-browsercloseclose0.20701 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 9.26Presto Windows 95desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 9.26closeWindows 95closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.26closeWindows 95 closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Opera 9.26 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 9.26closeWindows 95 closecloseclosecloseclose0.059 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 9.26 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23201 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera 9.26 Windows 95desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.26closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Opera 9.26closeWindows 95 Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera 9.26closeWindows 95closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:09:36 | by ThaDafinser