User agent detail

LG/KF750/v10a Browser/Obigo-Q05A/3.12 MMS/LG-MMS-V1.0/1.2 Java/ASVM/1.1 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/mobile/browser-obigo.yaml
Obigo Q 5A KF750mobile:featureclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Obigo Q 5.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.018 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Obigo Q 5.0closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.042 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
LG KF750closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
ObigoBrowser closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Obigo closeJVM LGKF750mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20701 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Obigo LGKF750smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 5close LGKF750closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Obigo 05 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesJavaCrawler0.08101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Obigo Browser LGLGMMScloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo Q 5A LGKF750mobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close LGKF750Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Obigo close LGKF750closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:09:36 | by ThaDafinser