User agent detail

Chrome LINUX 45.0.2454.85 (4c2743615eaa2806ad014c59bf6acbb652cf3aa8)-devel
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-849.php
Default Browser 0.0unknown unknownunknown unknownunknownunknownunknown0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Chrome LINUXcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Chrome closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Chrome WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Chrome closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

Chrome 45.0.2454.85 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Chrome Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23801 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
No result found
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Desktopcloseclose0.019 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Google Chrome LINUXcloseGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:09:36 | by ThaDafinser