User agent detail

DoCoMo/2.0 P904i( m65bot/0.1; c; http://m65.jp/bot.html )
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
m65bot 0.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesm65botBot/Crawler0.009 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesm65botclose0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
DoCoMo 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

NetFront close DoCoMomobile-browseryescloseclose0.20401 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesm65botclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

P904icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42102 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
docomo P904icloseclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
DoCoMo 2.0close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:09:35 | by ThaDafinser