User agent detail

ELinks/0.9.1 (textmode; Linux; 127x48)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/browser-text.yaml
ELinks 0.9.1 Linux desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
ELinks 0.9 Linux Desktop0.008 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
ELinks 0.9closeLinux closecloseDesktopclose0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
ELinks 0.9.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Elinks 0.9.1closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.21701 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Elinks 0.9Text-based GNU/Linux desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
ELinks 0.9closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Links 0.9.1 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

ELinks 0.9.1closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.07501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

ELinks Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23601 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
ELinks 0.9.1 Linux desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Elinks 0.9.1closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:09:33 | by ThaDafinser