User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050427 Red Hat/1.7.7-1.1.3.4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Zsxsoft
1.3
vendor/zsxsoft/php-useragent/tests/UserAgentList.php
Mozilla Compatible closeRed Hat closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.7.7closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Mozilla rv:1.7.7closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.20401 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Red Hat 1.7desktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 1.7closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeRed Hat 1.7.7closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 1.7.7closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15401 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Mozilla 1.7.7closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.076 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 1.7.7Gecko 20050427Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42902 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Gecko 1.7.7Red Hat desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeRed Hat closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:09:31 | by ThaDafinser