User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Teleca Q7; Brew 3.1.5; U; en) 240X400 LGE UX700
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close LGUX700closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Teleca-Obigo Brew 3.1Mobile Phoneyes0.008 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Teleca-Obigo closeBrew closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeBREWOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.003 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Obigo Q 7closeBrew 3.1.5LGUX700mobile-browseryescloseclose0.21201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Obigo Brew 3.1LGUX700smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Teleca Browser close LGUX700closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Teleca-Obigo Q7close closecloseclosecloseclose0.074 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 5.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23901 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo Q 7 Brew 3.1.5LGUX700mobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close LGUX700Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Teleca Q7close LGUX700closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:09:29 | by ThaDafinser