User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SAMSUNG; SAMSUNG-GT-S5380/Z3x_tmXXKK4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-821.php
Samsung 0.0unknown unknownJAVA unknownSamsungGT-S5380Mobile Phoneyes0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Samsung JAVA SamsungGT-S5380Mobile Phoneyes0.02 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

closeBada SamsungWave Ymobile-browseryescloseclose0.20801 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
SamsungGT-S5380smartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close SamsungSAMSUNG-GT-S5380closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 5.0 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23801 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Bada SamsungWave Ymobile:smartyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
close SamsungGT-S5380closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:09:26 | by ThaDafinser