User agent detail

MQQBrowser/Mini2.2 (Nokia3208c/10.50)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close Nokia3208cclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.024 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Nokia close closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.052 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
MQQBrowser Mini2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

QQbrowser Mini2.2close Nokia3208 classicmobile-browseryescloseclose0.20701 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
QQ Browser 2.2 Symbian Nokia3208csmartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Nokia Browser 10.50)closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mini 2.2close Nokia3208ccloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

QQ Browser NokiaOS NokiaNokia 3208ccloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
QQ Browser Mini 2.2 Series40 Nokia3208 classicmobile:featureyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
MQQBrowser Mini2.2close Nokia3208closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:09:24 | by ThaDafinser