User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Darwin; FreeBSD 5.6; en-GB; rv:1.8.1.17pre) Gecko/20080716 K-Meleon/1.5.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
K-Meleon 1.5Gecko unknownFreeBSD unknownunknowngeneral DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
K-Meleon 1.5Gecko FreeBSD Desktop0.019 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
K-Meleon 1.5closeFreeBSD closecloseDesktopclose0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.8.1.17preclose closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

K-Meleon 1.5.0closeBSD 5.6desktop-browsercloseclose0.21201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
K-meleon 1.5Gecko Mac desktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 1.8closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
K-Meleon 1.5.0closeFreeBSD 5.6closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 1.8.1.17closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15601 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

K-Meleon 1.5.0closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.07801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

K-Meleon 1.5.0Gecko 20080716FreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43502 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
K-Meleon 1.5.0Gecko 1.8.1FreeBSD 5.6desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
K-Meleon 1.5.0closeFreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:09:23 | by ThaDafinser