User agent detail

Sogou-Test-Spider/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows 98)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Sogou-Test-Spider 4.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesSogou-Test-SpiderBot/Crawler0.009 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesSogou-Test-Spiderclose0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
MSIE 5.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
IE 5.5closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyesSogou-Test-Spider/4.0close0.21001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Internet Explorer 5.5closeWindows 98closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesSogou-Test-Spiderclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Internet Explorer 5.5 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Internet Explorer 5.5closeWindows 98 closecloseclosecloseclose0.065 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Sogou "Search Dog" Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 5.5closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.022 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Internet Explorer 5.5closeWindows 98closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:09:18 | by ThaDafinser