User agent detail

Java/1.6.0_22
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
MobileDetect
2.8.22
vendor/mobiledetect/mobiledetectlib/tests/providers/vendors/SpecialCases.php
close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesJava Standard LibraryBot/Crawler0.011 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesJava Standard Libraryclose0.006 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Java 1.6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

Java 1.6.0_22closeJVM 1.6.0_22software-librarycloseclose0.20701 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Java 1.6 0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesJavaclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesJavaCrawler0.08 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Java Runtime Environment 1.6.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesJavaclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
HTTP Library Javaclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Desktopcloseclose0.017 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:09:15 | by ThaDafinser