User agent detail

w3m/0.5.2 (Linux i686; it; Debian-3.0.6-3)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Zsxsoft
1.3
vendor/zsxsoft/php-useragent/tests/UserAgentList.php
W3M 0.5.2closeDebian GNU/Linux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
w3m 0.5 Desktop0.004 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
w3m 0.5close closecloseDesktopclose0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
w3m 0.5.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeDebian closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

w3m 0.5.2closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.21101 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Debian 3.0desktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeDebian closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

w3m 0.5.2closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.10701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

w3m 0.5.2 Linux 3.0.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
w3m 0.5.2 Debian desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
W3M 0.5.2closeDebian GNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:09:12 | by ThaDafinser