User agent detail

Mozilla/2.0 (compatible; Ask Jeeves/Teoma; +http://about.ask.com/en/docs/about/webmasters.shtml)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
yesTeomaBot/Crawler0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesTeomaBot/Crawler0.006 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesTeomaclose0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyesAsk Jeeves/Teoma - cclose0.20401 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yesAsk JeevesSearch bot0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesAsk Jeevesclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesTeomaCrawler0.15301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Netscape Navigator 2.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23801 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesAsk Jeevesclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:09:11 | by ThaDafinser