User agent detail

Opera/9.00 (Windows 95; U; xx)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 9.00 Windows 95desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Opera 9.00Presto 2.0Win95 95Desktop0.009 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Opera 9.00close closecloseDesktopclose0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 9.00closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera 9.00closeWindows 95desktop-browsercloseclose0.20501 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 9.00Presto Windows 95desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 9.00closeWindows 95closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.0closeWindows 95 closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Opera 9.00 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 9.00closeWindows 95 closecloseclosecloseclose0.057 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 9.0 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera 9.00 Windows 95desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.00closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Opera 9.00closeWindows 95 Desktopcloseclose0.017 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera 9.00closeWindows 95closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:09:09 | by ThaDafinser