User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux) AppleWebKit/538.8 HbbTV/1.1.1 (+DL+PVR; selevision; Selevision EMC1000i; 1.0; 1.0;) CE-HTML/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/television/other.yaml
Webkit 538.8 EMC1000itelevisionclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
AppleWebKit 538.8closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close media-playercloseclose0.20601 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
GNU/Linux SelevisionEMC1000itv0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1closeLinux selevisionSelevision EMC1000icloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0WebKit 538.8closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15301 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 5.0WebKit 538.8Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Webkit 538.8 SelevisionEMC1000itelevisioncloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
closeLinux SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:09:07 | by ThaDafinser