User agent detail

Midori/0.4 (CentOS 6.5)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Midori 0.4 desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Midori 0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

Midori 0.4closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.21801 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Midori 0.4WebKit CentOS 6.5desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Midori 0.4closeCentOS closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Midori 0.4close closecloseclosecloseclose0.063 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Midori 0.4 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Midori 0.4 desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Midori 0.4close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:09:05 | by ThaDafinser