User agent detail

KWC-S2300-C/ACF1002 UP.Browser/7.2.7.2.549 (GUI) MMP/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close KyoceraS2300closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.2 Mobile Phoneyes0.031 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.2close closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.068 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
KWC-S2300-C ACF1002closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Openwave Mobile Browser 7.2.7.2.549close KyoceraS2300-Cmobile-browseryescloseclose0.20701 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.2 KyoceraS2300smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 7.2.7close KyoceraS2300closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.20201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Openwave Mobile Browser 7.2.7.2.549 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Openwave 7.2 KyoceraS2300-Cmobile:featureyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.022 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.2.7.2.549close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:09:04 | by ThaDafinser