User agent detail

HTC-Radar C110e/UCWEB2.2.0.157/47/355
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close HTCRadar C110eclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
HTC-Radar closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
UCBrowser close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

UC Browser close HTCRadar C110emobile-browseryescloseclose0.21201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
UC Browser 2.2 HTCRadarsmartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 2.2.0close HTCRadar C110ecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.14801 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

UC Browser 2.2.0.157close closecloseclosecloseclose0.072 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

UC Browser 2.2.0.157 HTC Radarcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23601 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
UC Browser 2.2Gecko HTCRadar C110emobile:featureyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
UC Browser 2.2.0.157close HTCRadarcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:08:54 | by ThaDafinser