User agent detail

GuzzleHttp/6.1.0 curl/7.35.0 PHP/5.5.9-1ubuntu4.14
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-865.php
yesGuzzle Http ClientBot/Crawler0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesGuzzle Http ClientBot/Crawler0.005 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesGuzzle Http Clientclose0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
curl 7.35.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeUbuntu closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyesPHPclose0.22101 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Guzzle (PHP HTTP Client) 0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

Ubuntu Web Browser 4.14 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15401 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

curl 7.35.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.077 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

cURL 7.35.0 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23601 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesPHPclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
curl 7.35.0close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:08:51 | by ThaDafinser