User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Ezooms/1.0; help@moz.com)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-046.php
yesEzoomsBot/Crawler0 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
vendor/piwik/device-detector/Tests/fixtures/bots.yml
closecloseyesEzoomsCrawler0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesEzoomsBot/Crawler0.007 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesEzoomsclose0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closecloseclosecloseyesEzoomsclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyesEzooms Crawlerclose0.20601 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yesEzoomsCrawler0.001 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesEzoomsCrawler0.074 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 5.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesEzooms Crawlerclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:08:46 | by ThaDafinser