User agent detail

Opera 9.4 (Windows NT 5.3; U; en)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
Opera 9.4Presto 2.0WinNT unknownunknownWindows DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Opera 9.4Presto 2.0WinNT Desktop0.013 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Opera 9.4close closecloseDesktopclose0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 9.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera 9.4closeWindows 5.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera 9.4closeWindows 5.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.21201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 9.4Presto Windows NTdesktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 9.4closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.4closeWindows closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Opera 9.4 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15301 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 9.4closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.071 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 9.4 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.25501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera 9.4 Windows NT 5.3desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.4closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Desktopcloseclose0.019 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera 9.4closeWindows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:08:46 | by ThaDafinser