User agent detail

MOT-V980M/80.2F.63. MIB/2.2.1 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close MotorolaV980Mclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Motorola Internet Browser 2.2 MotorolaV980MMobile Phoneyes0.015 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
MOT-V980M 80.2F.63.closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Motorola Internet Browser 2.2.1close MotorolaV980mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
MotorolaV980Msmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close MotorolaV980Mcloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

MIB 2.2.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.093 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera Mini MotorolaMotorola V980Mcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24201 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Motorola Internet Browser 2.2.1 MotorolaV980Mmobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close MotorolaV980MFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.031 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
MIB 2.2.1close MotorolaV980Mcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:08:45 | by ThaDafinser