User agent detail

Mozilla/4.51 (compatible; Opera 3.62; EPOC; 640x240)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/pda/psion.yaml
Opera 3.62 EPOC pdaclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 3.62closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera 3.62close closecloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera 3.62close desktop-browsercloseclose0.21101 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 3.62Presto 0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 3.62;close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 3.62close closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 3.62close closecloseclosecloseclose0.14601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 3.62 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24201 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera 3.62 EPOC pdacloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 3.62closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera 3.62close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:08:40 | by ThaDafinser