User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.21 (KHTML, like Gecko) profiller Safari/537.21
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-498.php
yesprofillerBot/Crawler0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesprofillerBot/Crawler0.016 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesprofillerclose0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Safari 537.21closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Safari 537.21closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Safari 537.21closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.21501 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Safari WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Safari 537.21WebKit 537.21closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose1.15207 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.072 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

WebKit 537.21Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Webkit 537.21Linux desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Safari closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:08:38 | by ThaDafinser