User agent detail

J-PHONE/3.0/J-SH05
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/mobile/carrier-softbank.yaml
J-SH05mobile:featureclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
J-PHONE 3.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

close SharpJ-SH05mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19601 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
SoftbankJ-SH05smartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

No result found
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
SharpJ-SH05mobile:featureyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
SoftBank Mobile J-SH05closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close SoftbankJ-SH05Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:08:35 | by ThaDafinser