User agent detail

Mozilla/4.1 (compatible; Teleca Q7; BMP 1.0.1; U; en) 240X400 LG-MN510
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close LGMN510closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Obigo Q 7closeBrew MP 1.0.1LGMN510mobile-browseryescloseclose0.21901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Obigo Brew 1.0LGMN510smartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 4.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Teleca Browser closeBrew MP 1.0.1LGMN510closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Netscape Navigator 4.1 LGLGMN510closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24001 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo Q 7 Brew MP 1.0.1LGMN510mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close LGMN510Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.021 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Teleca Q7close LGMN510closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:08:35 | by ThaDafinser