User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (U; Linux ICE4200; C) AppleWebKit/534.26 mbxtWebKit/1.0.0_pre-alpha (intelce)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/television/browser-machblue.yaml
MachBlue XT 1.0Webkit 534.26 televisionclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
AppleWebKit 534.26closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

MachBlue XT 1.0.0close media-playercloseclose0.21601 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
GNU/Linux desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0WebKit 534.26closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15901 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 5.0WebKit 534.26Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23801 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
MachBlue XT 1.0Webkit 534.26 televisioncloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:08:34 | by ThaDafinser