User agent detail

LG-GR500F/V10a Teleca/Q7.0 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close LGGR500Fclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Obigo Q 7.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.021 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Obigo Q 7.0closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.049 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
LG-GR500F V10acloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.005 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Obigo closeJVM LGGR500mobile-browseryescloseclose0.21201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Obigo LGGR500Fsmartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Teleca Browser close LGGR500Fcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Teleca-Obigo close closecloseclosecloseclose0.086 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

LGLGGR500Fcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo Q 7.0 LGGR500Fmobile:featureyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close LGGR500Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.018 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Teleca Q7.0close LGGR500Fcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:08:33 | by ThaDafinser