User agent detail

ACER-Pro80/1.02 UP/4.1.20i UP.Browser/4.1.20i-XXXX
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/mobile/browser-openwave.yaml
Openwave 4.1 Pro80mobile:featureclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1 Mobile Phoneyes0.015 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1close closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.041 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
ACER-Pro80 1.02closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1.20iclose AcerPro80mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20701 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1 AcerPro80smartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 4.1.20close closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.14901 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1.20i closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24901 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Openwave 4.1 AcerPro80mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close AcerPro80Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.025 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1.20iclose closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:08:31 | by ThaDafinser