User agent detail

Safari5531.21.10 CFNetwork/438.14 Darwin/9.8.0 (i386) (MacBook5%2C2)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
closeMac OS X 10.5.8closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
CFNetwork WebKit MacOSX 10.5AppleMacintoshDesktop0.016 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
CFNetwork closeDarwin closecloseDesktopclose0.039 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Safari5531 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Safari closeOS X 10.5.8desktop-browsercloseclose0.21601 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Mac 10.5desktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
CFNetwork 438.14closeMac OS X 10.5.8AppleMacBook5,2closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Safari closeDarwin closecloseclosecloseclose0.061 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Safari Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23601 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Safari Mac OS X 10.5.8desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
CFNetwork App 3.1closeMac OS X 10.5Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Safari closeMac OS Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:08:31 | by ThaDafinser