User agent detail

stamhub 1.0.94/SM-T310; 10094; 1.0.94; com.sec.yosemite.tab; lt01wifi; samsung/lt01wifixx/lt01wifi:4.2.2/JDQ39/T310XWUAMG3:user/release-keys
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close Samsunglt01wifixxclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
stamhub closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close Samsunglt01wifixxmobile-browseryescloseclose0.21701 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
SamsungGALAXY Tab 3 8.0" WiFitabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close Samsunglt01wifixxcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23601 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Mediahub Android 4.2.2SamsungGalaxy Tab 3 8.0tabletyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.018 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
close SamsungT310closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:08:28 | by ThaDafinser