User agent detail

Wget/1.16.1 (darwin14.0.0)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/bots/generic.yaml
closecloseyesWgetclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yeswgetOffline Browser0.008 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyeswgetclose0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Wget 1.16.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyesWgetclose0.20901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Wget 1.16 Mac desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Wget 1.16.1closeDarwin closecloseclosecloseclose0.062 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Wget 1.16.1 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23301 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesWgetclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
HTTP Library wgetclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
wget 1.16.1closeMac OS Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:08:27 | by ThaDafinser